Scientists have found compelling new evidence that the
ancestors of modern humans originated in Africa and not
independently in different regions of the world. The finding
may help resolve a long-standing anthropological debate and
may challenge the idea that humans can be classified in
discrete ethnic groups.
|
The long road. Human colonization routes
appear to originate in East Africa. CREDIT: : Prugnolle et al., Current Biology,
15,5 |
The origin of modern humans is a debated topic. One leading
theory postulates that the ancestors of all modern humans
originated in East Africa and then left the continent around
100,000 years ago. From there, they colonized the world,
displacing previously established hominids such as
Neanderthals in Europe. The best evidence so far for this
theory is the higher genetic diversity (and thus inferred
older age) of the African population compared to populations
from other continents.
A minority theory proposes that
modern humans evolved simultaneously in different regions of
the world from populations of archaic humans and that both
contributed to the current human genetic pool. The modern
Homo sapiens species is, therefore, seen as the result
of the sharing of genes and behaviors between archaic and
modern humans (Science, 12 January 2001, p. 230).
In the new study, geneticist François Balloux and
colleagues at the University of Cambridge show that geographic
distance from Ethiopia (the place where the oldest human
remains have been found) correlates with the genetic diversity
of 51 present human populations distributed worldwide. The
research gives support to the theory that, as humans left
Africa, some versions of their genes became progressively lost
over the migration routes. Thus, populations farther from
Ethiopia are characterized by lower genetic variability.
The team, which publishes its results today in Current
Biology, further observed that genetic diversity decreases
very smoothly along ancient colonization routes with
increasing distance from Africa. Under a multiregional origin
scenario there is no way such a decline in genetic diversity
with increasing distance from East Africa could be observed,
says Balloux.
"We were surprised such a simple analysis gave such a clear
result," Balloux says. He adds that genetic diversity
decreases smoothly between neighboring populations. The lack
of stark differences suggests that humans cannot be classified
in discrete ethnic groups or races on a genetic basis.
"I do find it fascinating that the correlation between
diversity and geographical location seems so simple and
monotonic," says Svante Pääbo, Director of the
Max-Planck-Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig,
Germany. "It fits nicely with what we believe we know about
the spread of modern humans."
--JACOPO PASOTTI
Related sites
Abstract
of study
François
Balloux's website
More
information on the human origins debate